Skip to main content
COUNT

COUNT vs MYOB

Deep ANZ compliance across a broad product family built over several generations.

A fragmented stack, or one infrastructure layer

Before the feature detail, the choice is architectural: keep MYOB at the centre and add the missing pieces around it, or run the firm and its clients on one rebuilt record.

The fragmented approach

A cloud ledger at the centre, a separate practice manager, AI tools reading a copy of the data, and paid connectors holding the parts together. Every join is another sync to watch, another subscription, and another place the same number can disagree.

The infrastructure approach

COUNT rebuilt the ledger and the practice engine together. Practice Manager and COUNT Workspace are two experiences on one system, with the intelligence reading live data — a single source of financial truth for the firm and its clients.

The verdict

MYOB's compliance and tax heritage in Australia and New Zealand is real, and for firms doing heavy statutory work its practice suite is capable. The cost is fragmentation: Solo, Business Lite and Pro, AccountRight and the practice products come from different eras and behave differently. COUNT trades that heritage for one modern product, faster onboarding, and automation that improves as you use it.

Why you might choose COUNT

Firms ready to consolidate: one modern platform where the ledger, practice tools and intelligence were built together, so subscription sprawl becomes a single system that gets better the more you use it.

Why you might choose to stay with MYOB

Established ANZ firms with deep statutory and tax workflow already built around the MYOB suite.

Summary comparison

How the two products differ on the things firms and businesses tell us matter most.

Summary feature comparison between COUNT and MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Unified practice and client productOne productBusiness or AccountRight, plus a practice product
Transaction codingCruise Control: five matching passes before AI is askedBank rules with embedded AI features
Multi-currencyNative on COUNTAccountRight Premier only
AI assistant and MCPChat, scheduled agents and an MCP serverNo branded assistant or MCP server
Practice licence costNo per-user fees; clients on COUNT freePaid, per user

The detailed comparison

Expand any area for a line-by-line view of how COUNT and MYOB differ.

Product architecture

The clearest difference. MYOB is a family of products; COUNT is one.

Product architecture: COUNT compared with MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Products needed for a firm and its clientsOneA client file product plus a practice product
Consistent interface across modulesYesVaries by module and generation
Cloud-nativeYesCloud and desktop-derived lines coexist
Moving up a tierA settingOften a product migration
Core accounting
Core accounting: COUNT compared with MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Invoicing and quotesUnlimited on every plan, with milestone payments and Stripe TerminalIncluded across tiers
PayrollNative in the US; manual payroll entry elsewhereEmployee count gated by tier
Bills and payment runsApprovals, batch runs and a bank-ready direct credit fileSupplier payments, tier dependent
Multi-currencyNative, with automatic gain and loss postingsAccountRight Premier
GST and IRDReturns generated from the ledger and filed to IRD over a direct connectionNZ GST reporting in the product and its API
Multi-entity consolidationFree on all tiersNot native to the business products
Automation and AI
Automation and AI: COUNT compared with MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Transaction codingFive deterministic passes, then AI, tuned per clientBank rules plus in-built AI features
AI agents and chatSaved skills on a schedule, workspace chat, approval on every writeEmbedded AI features, no branded assistant
Document captureReceipts, emailed bills, bank and loan statement extractionIn-product capture
Anomaly detectionDuplicate vendors, price-rise alerts, accuracy rules on reviewNot native
MCP serverOAuth 2.1 MCP server for ledger and practice toolsDeveloper partner API; no published MCP server
Practice management
Practice management: COUNT compared with MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Jobs, deadlines and workflowIncludedMYOB Practice, AE or AO
Workpapers and closePeriod close with thirteen modules and a review pipelineIncluded in the practice suite
Client record shared with the ledgerYesSynced between products
Client intelligenceClient synopsis, health signals and firm inbox triageNot native
Practice licence costNo per-user feesPaid, per user
Onboarding and change
Onboarding and change: COUNT compared with MYOB
CapabilityCOUNTMYOB
Typical setupDaysWeeks, often with a consultant
Data migrationGuided, with importers and a migration dashboardStructured project, often paid
Staff retrainingOne interface to learnPer-module training
Parallel run supportedYes, one full cyclePossible, manually managed

MYOB details sourced from public information as at August 2026: MYOB NZ plans and pricing, MYOB AccountRight Premier, MYOB Practice Compliance, MYOB developer programme. Pricing and features change; check the vendor for current details.

Where teams hit limits with MYOB

  • Fragmented product lines from different eras, with inconsistent interfaces
  • Multi-currency is gated to AccountRight Premier
  • AI is a set of embedded features rather than an assistant or agent platform
  • No published MCP server for AI assistants
  • Moving between MYOB products is itself a migration

Why you might choose to stay with MYOB

  • Strong ANZ compliance and tax heritage
  • Established practice-side tooling in MYOB Practice, AE and AO
  • Well understood by long-tenured firms
  • AccountRight option for complex inventory
  • A formal developer partner programme with a documented API

Switching from MYOB

  1. 1

    Structured migration for ledgers, clients and jobs, with opening balances that reconcile cleanly.

  2. 2

    Historic compliance documents attach to the new client record.

  3. 3

    Firm-wide rollout support so the whole team moves at once.

See COUNT next to your MYOB data

We'll import a copy so you can compare like for like.