Skip to main content
COUNT

COUNT vs Karbon

Established practice management for larger firms, centred on inboxes, work and collaboration.

A fragmented stack, or one infrastructure layer

Before the feature detail, the choice is architectural: keep Karbon at the centre and add the missing pieces around it, or run the firm and its clients on one rebuilt record.

The fragmented approach

A cloud ledger at the centre, a separate practice manager, AI tools reading a copy of the data, and paid connectors holding the parts together. Every join is another sync to watch, another subscription, and another place the same number can disagree.

The infrastructure approach

COUNT rebuilt the ledger and the practice engine together. Practice Manager and COUNT Workspace are two experiences on one system, with the intelligence reading live data — a single source of financial truth for the firm and its clients.

The verdict

Karbon is the strongest option in this list for a mid-size or larger firm that wants collaboration, triage and work management done properly, and has the budget for per-user licensing across the whole team. COUNT competes on a different axis: the practice tier is free, and the work management sits on the same record as the client's accounting, so nothing has to be reconciled between two systems.

Why you might choose COUNT

Firms that want the same workflow discipline on one modern platform: practice and client accounting share a single record, there is no per-user practice licence, and nothing is reconciled between two systems.

Why you might choose to stay with Karbon

Mid-size and larger firms that need deep collaboration, triage and work management across many staff.

Summary comparison

How the two products differ on the things firms and businesses tell us matter most.

Summary feature comparison between COUNT and Karbon
CapabilityCOUNTKarbon
Practice licence costNo per-user fees; clients on COUNT freeFrom about US$59 per user per month
Shared team inboxMicrosoft 365 firm inbox with AI triageCore strength
Client Workspace ledgerIncludedNot included
AI across the portfolioCOUNT Intelligence and scheduled agents over the ledgerKai, scoped to email and work
One system for practice and client dataYesNo

The detailed comparison

Expand any area for a line-by-line view of how COUNT and Karbon differ.

Collaboration
Collaboration: COUNT compared with Karbon
CapabilityCOUNTKarbon
Shared team inbox and triageMicrosoft 365 firm inbox with AI triageBest in class
Work items and assignmentsTasks, recurring tasks and projectsIncluded
Internal comments and handoverIncludedIncluded
Client requests and chasingQuestionnaires and AI-drafted queriesClient portal and requests
MeetingsGoogle Meet and Zoom integrationThird-party
Work management
Work management: COUNT compared with Karbon
CapabilityCOUNTKarbon
Recurring compliance workIncludedIncluded
Capacity and budget versus actualIncludedIncluded
Time and billingTimers, timesheets and firm billing templatesIncluded
Period close and workpapersThirteen close modules with a review pipelineNot a workpapers product
Practice-wide analyticsCOUNT Intelligence with evidence-backed client healthInsights reporting
Platform and AI
Platform and AI: COUNT compared with Karbon
CapabilityCOUNTKarbon
AI assistantClient Workspace chat over the ledger, with approval on every writeKai, focused on email, work and drafting
Agents across many clientsRun one skill across up to fifty workspaces on a scheduleNot offered
APIPartner APIPublic REST API
MCP serverOAuth 2.1 MCP server for ledger and firm toolsNot published
Single sign-onGoogle and Microsoft Entra ID, freeEntra ID supported
Stack and cost
Stack and cost: COUNT compared with Karbon
CapabilityCOUNTKarbon
General ledgerIncluded via Client WorkspaceExternal
Practice licenceNo per-user fees; clients on COUNT freeAbout US$59 to US$79 per user per month
Cost for a ten-person firmFree, or NZ$99/month on ProRoughly US$7,000 per year before the ledger
Subscriptions to run a practiceOneTwo or more
Typical implementationDaysWeeks with onboarding support

Karbon details sourced from public information as at August 2026: Karbon pricing, Karbon AI, Karbon client portal. Pricing and features change; check the vendor for current details.

Where teams hit limits with Karbon

  • No general ledger or COUNT Workspace
  • Per-user pricing is among the highest in the category
  • Implementation effort is significant
  • Still needs a document or workpaper layer for some firms
  • No published MCP server for firm data

Why you might choose to stay with Karbon

  • Excellent shared inbox and triage model
  • Strong work item and workflow management
  • Good client collaboration and requests
  • Proven at larger firm scale

Switching from Karbon

  1. 1

    Import clients, contacts, work items and templates.

  2. 2

    Map Karbon work statuses to COUNT job stages.

  3. 3

    Migrate team by team rather than all at once.

See COUNT next to your Karbon data

We'll import a copy so you can compare like for like.